Yep, it's using the wrong data type. On amd64 it maps to a 64 bit int, which is why I never noticed this. On 32 bit platforms however, it maps to 32 bits.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389321 Title: partx wraps partition offset and length mod 2^32 (2^23 sectors) Status in “util-linux” package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: I notified this bug with util-linux 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2 and kernel 3.13.0-39-generic (i386732 bit) with Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS I examined a 8gb sd-card image via loop device; parted reports: # parted /dev/loop0 u b print Modell: Loopback device (loop) Festplatte /dev/loop0: 7822376960B Sektorgröße (logisch/physisch): 512B/512B Partitionstabelle: msdos Nummer Anfang Ende Größe Typ Dateisystem Flags 1 4194304B 123000319B 118806016B primary LBA 2 125829120B 7788822527B 7662993408B extended 5 130023424B 264241151B 134217728B logical fat32 LBA 6 268435456B 3245342719B 2976907264B logical ext4 7 3246391296B 3309305855B 62914560B logical fat32 LBA 8 3313500160B 7785676799B 4472176640B logical ext4 3 7788822528B 7822376959B 33554432B primary ext4 Then I made partition devices: # partx -a /dev/loop0 This is what the kernel sees: # cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 7 0 7639040 loop0 259 0 116021 loop0p1 259 1 1 loop0p2 259 2 32768 loop0p3 259 3 131072 loop0p5 259 4 2907136 loop0p6 259 5 61440 loop0p7 259 6 173056 loop0p8 First thing I noticed: the contents of partition 3 was different from the one at the corresponding offset within the image file. Then I saw - as you can see above - that also partition 8 is much smaller than reported by parted. In fact, the difference between the partition size as seen by the kernel (in 1024 byte blocks) to the one in the MBR is exactly 4294967296 bytes or 2^32. This prompted me to check, if a similar wraparound happened to the offset of partition 3, and compared its content to that at offset mod 2^32 (3493855232) in the image file: sha256sum of the next 100 sectors compared identical. It seems pretty obvious that partx uses 32-bit integers for offset and size, and fails with sizes bigger than 4 gb. I think this bug is severe, as partitions beyond 4 gb are mapped to a different area, and writing to them overwrites data in other partitions. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1389321/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
