$ ./remove-package -m "1.8.2 abandoned, will wait for 1.8.3 (LP: #1820317)" -s
disco-proposed iptables
Removing packages from disco-proposed:
iptables 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco
iptables 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
iptables 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
iptables 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
iptables 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
iptables 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
iptables 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
iptables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
iptables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
iptables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
iptables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
iptables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
iptables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libip4tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libip4tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libip4tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libip4tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libip4tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libip4tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libip4tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libip4tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libip4tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libip4tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libip4tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libip4tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libip6tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libip6tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libip6tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libip6tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libip6tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libip6tc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libip6tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libip6tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libip6tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libip6tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libip6tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libip6tc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libiptc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libiptc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libiptc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libiptc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libiptc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libiptc-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libiptc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libiptc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libiptc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libiptc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libiptc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libiptc0 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libxtables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libxtables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libxtables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libxtables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libxtables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libxtables-dev 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
libxtables12 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco amd64
libxtables12 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco arm64
libxtables12 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco armhf
libxtables12 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco i386
libxtables12 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco ppc64el
libxtables12 1.8.2-4ubuntu1 in disco s390x
Comment: 1.8.2 abandoned, will wait for 1.8.3 (LP: #1820317)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820317
Title:
The firewalld autopackage tests fail due to iptables
Status in firewalld package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in iptables package in Ubuntu:
Won't Fix
Status in iptables package in Debian:
Unknown
Bug description:
The firewalld autopkgtest fail in disco on what looks like an iptables
issue
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac
/autopkgtest-
disco/disco/amd64/f/firewalld/20190315_154203_ef4d6@/log.gz
'Mar 15 15:41:39 autopkgtest firewalld[1691]: ERROR:
'/usr/sbin/iptables-restore -w -n' failed: iptables-restore v1.8.2 (nf_tables):
line 4: RULE_REPLACE failed (No
such file or directory): rule in chain INPUT
line 4: RULE_REPLACE failed (No
such file or directory): rule in chain OUTPUT'
That looks like the issue reported on
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914694 which is fixed in
upstream iptables
https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=947c51c95
That fix seems to depends on git master changes from libnftnl
https://git.netfilter.org/libnftnl/log/
('chain: Support per chain rules list' and following commits)
Unsure at this point what's best disco, if we should start looking at
backporting those changes?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firewalld/+bug/1820317/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
