Foundations team, has anyone looked at ureadahead lately to make sure that it still makes sense to include it?
(a) I suspect SSDs don't benefit much from it (b) I suspect systems with spinning metal drives are also unlikely to have the memory to cache all those files, nor the free IO cycles to spend on caching. (c) If 90k files are ignored entirely because the paths are all relative, is anything being cached at all? I realize these are contradictory concerns. :) Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ureadahead in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579580 Title: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output Status in ureadahead package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: ureadahead reports relative path errors in my journalctl output. This is currently 4368 lines of useless annoyances in my logs. To see if you have this problem, run: journalctl -b | grep ureadahead | grep relative | wc -l Thanks ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: ureadahead 0.100.0-19 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.39-generic 4.4.8 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zcommon znvpair zavl ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 8 15:55:18 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-04 (34 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Beta amd64 (20160325) ProcEnviron: TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ureadahead UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1579580/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
