On the suggested fix: Why even keep the printf? Why not switch to just print?
I'm not a C expert by any means, but shouldn't
printf("%s", <something returning a string>)
be completely equivalent to
print(<something returning a string>)
With the exception that the second one should be very slightly less overhead?-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644048 Title: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error Status in bash package in Ubuntu: New Status in bash source package in Trusty: New Bug description: This weirdly only fails on arm64. ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/help.def:130:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] The attached debdiff will be uploaded to trusty-proposed soon. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1644048/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
