Why was this bug marked as invalid?
If a command gives a warning it shows that something is not properly
implemented.
Either the warning is deprecated or the cause for the warning is reasonable and
the issue should be fixed.
My understanding of proper programming is that every entry in /etc/passwd must
have existing values.
So if there is a home dir specified in /etc/passwd I expect it to exist or to
be created at boot time.
Ohterwise programs that may rely on the values in /etc/passwd may not work
properly.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Opinion
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1595076
Title:
ubuntu 16 pwck error
Status in shadow package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
running pwck after installing ubuntu 16 gives an error:
pwck
user 'systemd-resolve': directory '/run/systemd/resolve' does not exist
I think that every home directory specified in /etc/passwd must exist.
If systemd-resolve has a volatile home directory I expect this directory to
be created at boot time.
It seems that there is no regression test before release that makes
sure that no such errors are reported.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1595076/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
