On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Mel Chua <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > I'd be fine with github, really - it's all git, repositories are easy to > clone and migrate, it's not like there's data lock-in. I'd still want to > do an actual feature comparison to gitorious or other competitors to see > if it's actually the best solution, though (as I'd reckon we would want > to do with anything we're looking at for TOS infra). Happy to help with > the need-gathering portion of things, since I plan on making POSSEs a > customer of that sort of service. :)
For feature comparison, I find that they are about on par. The biggest thing that I find github has over gitorious is the bug tracker/discussion features. When I use github, I feel that it is easier to communicate with the developer(s) as you can put in bug reports or other feedback to the developer through github, no need to join a mailing list to contact the developers. Overall I feel that feature is the reason I use github over gitorious. Just my $0.02. Justin Lewis http://jlewopensource.com _______________________________________________ tos mailing list tos@teachingopensource.org http://teachingopensource.org/mailman/listinfo/tos
