2011/2/19 Karsten Wade <kw...@redhat.com>: > Honestly, I'd prefer you not to be quiet, but I'd also prefer us to > not derail work.
Fair enough. And, your reply helped. It was the first message I've seen that provides the needed context to understand the scope/strategy being taken. As you pointed out, I was clearly coming from one POV, which doesn't incorporate the view that is being taken in these steps. Given that there were +1s on my original concerns, I suspect this dialog was necessary to help others in the community understand what is going on as well. One could argue that I should have simply asked more questions. I'll try and do that in the future. Cheers, Matt PS. If my strawman was thinly provisioned, it was because I was trying to be green, and conserve resources. *cough* _______________________________________________ tos mailing list tos@teachingopensource.org http://teachingopensource.org/mailman/listinfo/tos
