Are you sure you replied to the correct topic? I can't follow, because I 
don't see any relation between your answer and the issue.
The target file of a merge always exists, and the frequencey of whatever 
check should not matter. Please clarify. Thanks!
Anyway, I will update to the new TSVN when there's one.

Am Samstag, 21. März 2020 09:47:00 UTC+1 schrieb Stefan:
>
> Should work better now (as of r28818):
> I've reduced the time checks to twice a second, and also I'm now forcing 
> the check whether the file exists (i.e., don't use the cached info 
> anymore): that Exist()-check returns false (and caches that info) also if 
> the file is locked/not accessible.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TortoiseSVN" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tortoisesvn/5e27cd3c-d430-48d2-9de4-ed7802d1687e%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to