On 24/08/2018 20:44, Stefan via TortoiseSVN wrote:
> The problem with a warning label is that if it's there all the time,
> users tend to blend it out and as soon as the warning really applies
> to them, they won't even see it anymore.
>
Certainly that's right, but I can't think of a better (i.e. feasible to
implement/add) alternative. That way at least users would have a chance
to spot the potential issue. W/o such warning they'd have little to no
hint about it.

But I can understand if you don't feel strongly about adding such
warning message there.

Regards,
Stefan


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TortoiseSVN" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tortoisesvn/98d253c1-b89e-db03-ab80-f86d2c894893%40gmx.de.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to