Damien Corbishley wrote:
I guess I've posted this far too late, I've only just got back from
hols...
Are we way off having the number of rows affected by an update / delete
being returned? Or at least made accessible?
I know the village code returns the count, but the Base classes just
don't store it anywhere.
It can probably be done by changing the BasePeer doUpdate() and
doDelete() methods to return the desired value however this would be an
enhancement for 3.2 rather than a fix for 3.1.1.
Scott
--
Scott Eade
Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
http://www.backstagetech.com.au
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
