On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 17:16, Michael Manske wrote:
> After a short look into several generated sources i have to agree with Alex,
> imho these throws declarations are not neccessary for the mentioned
> setSomeForeignKey() methods. I would appreciate if the declarations would be
> removed with the next release.

Is it the case that the methods _never_ throw the exception regardless
of targeted database?

Dave



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to