>>>>> Nicolas Vigier <bo...@mars-attacks.org> writes:
> On Wed, 22 May 2019, Colin Baxter wrote:
>>
>> I'm at the tor web-site https://www.torproject.org/, but find no
>> link to download a 32bit linux tor-browser. The download link
>> gives 64bit only. I have to select "Download in another language
>> or platform" in order *eventually* to find the 32bit version --
>> something I did out of desperation. I hate to say this but 32bit
>> machines are going to be around for a bit longer. Why therefore
>> is the default 64bit? There should not be any defaults; all
>> versions should be clearly and *equally* accessible from *one*
>> page called `Download'. Pretty revolutionary, eh?
> 32bits downloads is still available and not difficult to find, so
Yes they are available but you have to search for them. A visitor to the
web-site does not have to search for the 64bit version. Why are you
discriminating against 32bit users?
> I don't think that is a problem. Most people have 64bit hardware
> and should use the 64bit version, so I think it makes sense to
> have it as the default. Especially since some people don't know
> what the difference between the two is and would just pick a
> random one if there was no default.
That's your opinion - you have not given any evidence that "most people
have 64bit" machines.
--
Colin Baxter
m43...@yandex.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
