glad to hear that :) George Kadianakis: > bo0od <bo...@riseup.net> writes: > >> I see that from a safe hosting perspective to Tor Hidden services, That >> Tor should maintain and ship onion balance by default. >> >> Which is sadly last ever maintained before more than 1 year or so, and >> also it lacks the support of onion v3. >> >> This is really useful and needed for cheep/safe hosting of a hidden >> service at home or any small server. >> >> as VPS not really always wise to host a hidden service + not much safe >> and trusted who accept btc and accept onion hidden service in their >> servers at the same time. >> >> so i prefer self hosted with latest Tor upgrade (onion v3) , but sadly >> not possible atm with a DOS protection. >> >> so i hope Tor take care of that and consider it as a core software for >> now and the future. >> >> Thank You! >> > > Yes, I agree that onionbalance is an essential tool for onion service > operators. > > We have looked into how to make that possible for v3s but it doesn't > seem to be a trivial project: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/26768 > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2018-April/013128.html > > For what it's worth, we've been applying for onion-service related > funding as an organization so that we have more resources to support > third-party tools like onionbalance. > > Other than that, we've been ultra busy bugfixing v3s and in general > supporting them, that does not allow us much time into improving > onionbalance given the current state of our resources. > > Hope this was useful! :) >
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
