‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ El 14 de agosto de 2018 8:17 PM, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> escribió:
> On 08/13/2018 07:52 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: > > > Hi, is there a way to measure the level of anonymity on a system? > > Sure. There's some literature. Check out > https://www.freehaven.net/papers.html. Thanks, lots of good stuff!!! > > Ricochet is way better to protect anonymity. I don’t need a phone number, > > not even a name, I just use the onion service hostname. With Richochet I am > > anonymous all the time unless I identify myself. > > Email may not be as good as Signal for end to end encryption (even with > > pgp), but it can be way better for anonymity. For instance, this email > > account was created using Tor in Protonmail, and there are other mail > > providers that allow me to this. If I always use Protonmail with Tor, it is > > very hard for Protonmail to learn who am I and where I live, doing that > > with Signal is harder. However with Ricochet is way easier. > > Well, there's a huge metadata issue with email. Using .onion webmail > mitigates much of it. But everyone needs to watch their OPSEC, to avoid > deanonymization. > > And why do you say that deanonymization is way easier with Ricochet? > It's all via .onion instances. But I gather that Tor Project no longer > actively supports the work. What I meant is that is easier to stay anonyumouse on a system like Ricochet. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
