On 3 October 2016 at 23:15, <ban...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > The logic of blocking everything completely *all the time* (like Google > does) is already a big problem
Here's a picture of me loading Google over Tor: https://imgur.com/gallery/pMabZ That much works. A narcissistic self-search subsequently crashed, very amusingly: https://imgur.com/gallery/vZNxF And doing "New Identity" led to a CAPTCHA; but the subsequent "New Identity" worked just fine. Analysis: I agree, Google have some work to do. :-) with the IPv4 address space becoming over saturated. Its not a Tor only > thing. Sometimes an entire country is behind a single NAT access point. > My memory is that that was no longer the case any more, at least for any sizeable country. Certainly it _used_ to be true. Have you a recent citation, please? > Researching ways that don't infringe on user's privacy but lets traffic > through is very hard and costly - I'm sure you agree. Yes. Indeed, the two may be in opposition. > When discussing alternatives to persistent CAPTCHAs the Cloudflare > reaction was to tell Tor "you do it" since they don't really have an > incentive to fund this. (Yes I already your post about the different > traffic white-listing requirements of for different business models). What > is can be done with logic like this? Get people to change the logic by which they are assessing the situation? It's a bit of a Kobayashi Maru cheat, but it's what needs to happen in a no-win scenario. -a -- http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/aboutalecm -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
