No they did not as you saw in the excerpt I posted. I told them now all is well 
with out going into detail. I had 24 hours to send them an all clear or they 
would restrict my network bandwidth and I want the gigabit connection for all 
the services I run on my vps. So it has ben up and running I believe since 
Sunday now, or was it Monday. Now I wait for the full cycle to take effect and 
hope someone can use the 50mbps bandwidth I set up. Hopefully the network will 
be a lot faster as I'm not actually using that but for icecast and some 
streaming services.
> On Aug 23, 2016, at 2:40 PM, Dave Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> That is not a DMCA complaint, a complaint under the DMCA is required to
> be specific, and reports are made under oath and penalty of perjury that
> the complainer owns the copyright for the item in question.
> 
> However, your host may not be passing on all the details to you, that's
> a matter of discussion between yourself and your host.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Sarah Alawami wrote:
>> No, the DMCA was not specific. That's all they told me was that copyright
>> material were going through the vps and  I was breaking the TOS.
>>> On Aug 22, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Mike Perry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sarah Alawami:
>>>> Hello to all. Sadly I have to shut down my tor relay after less then 24 
>>>> hours, as I received a copyright violation and I don't want any network 
>>>> restrictions  placed on me as I want the 150mbps speed.
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry to all who were using it, but yeah there it is.
>>> 
>>> Was this a DMCA takedown related to bittorrent traffic? When I ran an
>>> exit, I had a lot of luck with this policy:
>>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
>>> 
>>> Basically restricting yourself to core internet services reduces the
>>> chances that bittorrent clients choose a port from the policy. With a
>>> 1Gbit exit and that policy, I went from 60 DMCA notices a day down to 0
>>> over the life of the exit (about 3 years).
>>> 
>>> Unless something new is happening? Did the complaint(s) give specifics
>>> about the location and type of infringing content that was accessed?
>>> 
>>> More services are always better. I've been thinking about making that
>>> policy into a torrc option, so it would be useful to know if the
>>> situation has changed.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Mike Perry
>>> -- 
>>> tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>> 
>> -- 
>> tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> 
> -- 
> tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Reply via email to