-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I agree with this. The whole 'user-friendly' experience is nice. If the privacy community can get more and more users on more secure and privacy-friendly software it becomes a more 'natural' thing. You cannot target every single human being at once, when everyone is securing all information, it's difficult to determine which users are securing malicious information. There are very strong adversaries so making traffic 'stand-out' less would be a good goal...
On 08/18/16 23:25, grarpamp wrote: > I'd agree that TBB is becoming more streamlined. (Maybe a relay > running tool for windows still needs done.) And that very few > browsers, if any, stand with TBB in doing some of the privacy > things that need to be done, in the browser where they belong. When > you layer better privacy oriented apps (perhaps like TBB), into > better privacy oriented platforms (perhaps like Whonix/Qubes), > (tools the list may happen to be more familiar with), even plugged > into interesting overlay networks, the overall posture in > privacy/anonymity can be better. No tool or user is perfect > though. And the GPA and others are strong opponents. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXtn7vAAoJELvzSRlN6nI7Y9IH/3Eh0PuLQzKyJMH4xG18mdMN RXdrMvC+FZzI8jUO9MmnmPpx8YroWY5GDwBbLXwqpW8tQbCGa+qQJ02Im8jWverN tB0nDDdPnpm8fNY2IvXp2vs6UJMwYCJvf9BBJkA/LfFV8y2Cg0Ul/l3BXkAo1uSz Sc0yrlK+ZxLhPhMeRmTdC8k2fnFmeQrcwYR1IUhpNEP7tac0MmcL+uxDHRegvM25 sdpy4ytvP1T5OYvOx3KpWqZh+S8sgFaQeWbQrVmJ114qI20NDG+reLPnRrHDXsW1 CuSPYWlsZBP/IK98YRg4EmYLR8LrYvVrkm1S5sdzRyL+Ak5s+XCKGtUA5Din3xs= =f2mP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
