I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT: tor-talk mailing list. Could you please explain this to me in a not scientific language and to tell me what I have to do to be protected? Thanks in advance.
2015-12-11 7:00 GMT-05:00 <[email protected]>: > Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tor-talk digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: single entity running >36% exit probability with 5 > relays? scary. (meejah) > 2. Save Crypto: Tell the White House We Can't Sacrifice Security > (grarpamp) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 02:35:36 +0400 > From: meejah <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] single entity running >36% exit probability > with 5 relays? scary. > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > It seems there's "some" interest in upgrading TorFlow? I can't in good > conscience say that -- without funding -- I alone can replace it -- but > I do have an out-of-date txtorcon exit-relay scanning system that could > *become* a "next gen" torflow. > > I am ready and willing to provide mentorship to make this happen. > > >From my perspective, the best-case would be a motivated and knowledeble > student or intermediate programmer who is self-motivated and already > versed in event-based programming (ideally Twisted, but asyncio, > node.js, boost's asio or others are great too). > > IMO, the best thing would be for authority operators to enumerate on a > wiki page or ticket a) their requirements and b) their issues with > TorFlow. Or, I guess, c) torflow is amazing and meejah has the wrong > impression :) > > Cheers, > > -- > meejah > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:46:48 -0500 > From: grarpamp <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [tor-talk] Save Crypto: Tell the White House We Can't > Sacrifice Security > Message-ID: > < > cad2ti29ov7aavxedfgma+5kagzm0wwdphoms7oiax9nwz6z...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/save-crypto-tell-white-house-we-cant-sacrifice-security > > https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/publicly-affirm-your-support-strong-encryption > https://www.whitehouse.gov/webform/share-your-thoughts-onstrong-encryption > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > tor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > > > ------------------------------ > > End of tor-talk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 13 > **************************************** > -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
