controlled opposition is why i skreech about tor - that it is looked to as THE SOLUTION ... they know what people are using - not as bad as controlled demolition but...
would be more effective if people were working on different projects for security .... as many as possible On Jul 29, 2015 11:57 PM, "Alexandre Guillioud" < [email protected]> wrote: > I would risk a dumb question : how can it be 'controlled opposition" when > their (NSA) capacities to listen to whoever they want on tor havn't been > demonstrated nor refuted ? > > Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015, Juan <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +0000 > > Virgil Griffith <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military > > >> ntending to use Tor for? > > > > me: > > > > > > > > > Exactly the same things they use it for right now. > > > > > > Communications for their murdering operations, spying, > > > propaganda. > > > > > > Spread of american fascism. > > > > > > addendum : a Pretty Good Name (PGN) and description for tor is > > 'controlled opposition'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] <javascript:;> > > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
