-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 > This is probably not going to work as intended with how MyFamily > works. I guess we should call a-f a big happy family and be done > with it.
For simplicity reasons probably, but I don't see any reason why a tor client would have a problem with that? And the group-by family analysis has no problem with it either. If this kind of MyFamily configuration is intended by the operators than it is no misconfiguration by design. Just in most cases it probably is. For clarity reasons it would be great if 'organizational' relays (d,e,f) would have distinct contactInfo (compared to personal relays (a,b,c). > Then again, MyFamily is on its way out I hear. Is that true and > when does it disappear? I hope it will be replaced by prop 242. https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/proposals/242-better-families.txt See also: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-March/008516.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVEBB+AAoJEFv7XvVCELh0HNgP/joYlzhIHUrPBCWgWOxJevBC rjnVLB9In2Y6L78ljJI7MMgkNtk4VCjlCbJPWx61XibVoia8xXiJqq9fK+7ZG/tU 5u4j1PL+/gtOqVbMsH1aYaBcQPvqJMkNgjFgG8UePPRq98KeiIBy87Ob4R7wVD/M Pw54YXVX0NS2Ye/G1+vdJWtR6yjvJCREwN0Xa1VCVE6yKT4CWbc8h6K+jZ6mEDHn s1LEsphfF4qlXteTGSSn9XUuAnd2s5kwGnyWVMGrT9uzveZf509yi6QkzfXEDsN7 BHiuPyvqslBa+WnLMaDBJTC39EuXE25r/sEttQfuvQVZdAIVg89L6YOKy+PLU8BT eAOxA12xMYKIUiQdm9Nk/4ZSKXw5UqSmc+PF3zwoFaVLbOTiF1OzfbcZlT8p1apA E0BLA8qyI29Ma8EjKqTCNZ91yygWQs/LV3kVwHz+nCl1S0JScMkq4gNmb9XELwtt vHERKjRL0jNyVyEtIeOfuuHvCvCuDlW4otbn0jXGlm8JmwO3psYWApnYt83PP//4 dBJ4aK7DMD7c6iFWQamkQbtHJxc8H/JJFJfRXbqicZWQ4rh9nH1c+HCbVgB7NPNo NrWkPEdd1Ekp3hu6yLF2q/aTssfmlYuucVubX9Nf6Y25QJDJBx31j4+mjrz+5mhr 41ZK7UD1AMwqeMsF/Jdk =i1g3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
