On 01/30/2015 06:48 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: >> JonDoNym / JAP > > I'm seeing references to this tool pop up recently in various > places. Keep in mind the controversie from years ago > and read the label on the tin carefully. That's not to say > it's not fit for use once you understand its fitness. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Anon_Proxy
That is a concern. And although they've arguably addressed it through diversification in multiple jurisdictions, they're upfront about focusing on business-class pseudonymity. In anonymity space, they are far closer to VPNs than to Tor, I think. Also, their mixes are fixed. So as with VPNs, there's a one-to-one mapping of entry and exit IPs. Furthermore, their userbase is much smaller than for Tor and popular VPN services. -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
