The fact of the matter is, you tweeted that you were attempting a zero day exploit with Tor, and you used a large number of nodes to (accomplish?) that. Whether or not you were or were not attempting a Sybil attack, that's the only thing that people can see as the "attack" that was mentioned.
I mean, if you wanted to you could maybe publically post saying that you were creating free exits, instead of saying that Tor users are criminals/pedos/hackers. E.g. https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548666216089653248 https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548605171828543490 https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548575072332836864 https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548525026027507712 Tor's network is all about consensus; adding new relays is super detectable and easy to mitigate. The system is decentralized. If someone (e.g. a government) wanted it gone, it would have been removed a long time ago. You manning the email account appear to at least be mildly interested in supporting Tor, but it seems like the Twitter account person is working opposite in force. That's all it looks like to me. On Fri Dec 26 2014 at 6:58:20 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no Sybil attack. > > If yes, it'd be nice to know what your aims are in the Sybil attack. > > Because thus far it is unclear to me what your motives or objectives > > are. > > > > -V > > -- > > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > > > > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
