It's a bit odd that any of them would have the BadExit flag since it's pretty unlikely you could pull off a successful Sybil attack from so tightly grouped hosts. > I'm abit concerned about not having a consensus of the dirauth's > knowing about the BadExit flag. Is this a problem? Only 4/9 know about > that flag right now and 3/9 are missing signatures. Can someone > explain this better? Thanks! > > https://consensus-health.torproject.org/ > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Soul Plane <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Thomas White <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> There has been some worry about a possible Sybil attack on the Tor >>> network and a threat of deploying a 0 day once a Sybil has been >>> confirmed. The concerned relays right now are using then nickname >>> LizardNSA followed by random characters >>> >> >> There is also FuslVZTOR followed by random characters, 246 right now all >> from uk 212.38.181.x. I checked a couple the family info on a couple and >> none is set. I don't know if that is normal or not I've never watched >> the >> relays. >> -- >> tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] >> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk >
-- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
