15.12.2014, 21:43 Juan: I'd like to uncouple this from the thread as it is not about the initial topic, unfortunately, I think.
>> My point, which you sidestep, is that it's past time for you to >> produce some evidence for backdoors in Tor. > > Did I ever state "there are backdoors"? No I didn't. You > are asking for evidence to back up something I never said. > > On the other hand, what would a backdoor in tor or similar > software look like? I'm guessing there are no 'backdoors' in > tor, only 'bugs'. I think it's called "plausible deniability" > or something like that... > Unfortunately that is true, Tor contains bugs. Probably hidden and hard to trigger, as I hope unit-test would uncover trivial bugs. > >> are free to inspect the source code, to probe the network as you like >> with your relays and clients, and to do whatever else you can >> imagine. Go for it. > > Why on earth should I do other people's work? Help the > propaganda efforts of the US government? Please =) I don't think that it would be helpful if you aren't doing it for the fun, the fame or whatever else code reviewers reasons are... beside money. -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
