On 11/2/14, Lars Boegild Thomsen <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > In the case of a standard Cloak (as least as it is envisioned right now) > that is not a problem for Cloak then. Cloak _will_ be the Wireless Access > Point, it will enforce client isolation at Wi-Fi level and it will hand out > separate address to each client. > > Hey - one challenge down :)
agreed. i mention this because the way i usually use transparent proxy mode is as mentioned above: a local wifi router connected to transparent Tor proxy connected to ISP. in this situation, all the clients are behind the NAT WiFi router, which complicated isolation. if you _are_ the WiFi access point, as you intend to be, then there is no NAT, and you avoid this issue. (perhaps note to end-user: best to connect clients directly to Cloak, rather than a router to Cloak :) thank you for your prompt responses and attention to these details! best regards, -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
