> We have placed MKRAND - A Digital Random Bit Generator, on GitHub, and it > would be helpful to receive some feedback regarding its potential use in > the TOR project.
What benefit would it give? What would it replace? This seems to me to solve a problem that has already solved, but in an obfuscated way filled with new age buzzwords. "Syntropic Randomness is a co-creative act between Man, Machine, and Universe." - exactly how high do you have to be to write such things? > This RBG does not use mathematical methods, and thus does not suffer from > wraparound issues or dependency on ALU architectures. Has this ever been an issue? You mention dependency on ALU architectures while still talking about clock cycles in your comments - are these some kind of virtual clock cycles then? > The RBG can be considered alpha-quality at this stage and is not ready for > production use, however it is appropriate for research into new kinds of > obfuscation protocols and key generation schemes. what kind of obfuscation protocols? Yeah, I think a paper is necessary here.. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
