And since it's not possible to do this right without any leaks due to software bugs, planted flaws and insiders, the only thing it will lead to is to make it impossible for the users to verify the decisions leading up to which servers are bad. The NSA will still get your precious warnings.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:44 PM, <t...@t-3.net> wrote: > Actually... > > A bad-relays mailing list would IMO take a degree of care to do right, > considering that email gets gathered at the packet level by intelligence > agencies who are expected to be initiating attacks. Sensitive stuff would > belong as GPG or PGP emails or similar. Juicy details regarding bad-relays > discussion should be tighter than even a closed mailing list, is my thought. > > > > > > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
