On 7/6/2014 3:39 PM, C B wrote:
Not as many live here as vacation here. A very large number of the rich and
powerful visit. And as the first in the nation primary, every Presidential
candidate spends a lot of time here. Yes it is often hard to get laws against
things because politicians do not want to get caught. We recently outlawed
using cellphones in a very restrictive law that I certainly hope is repealed
before it goes into effect next year. We do not require seat belts or motor
cycle helmets, but have fairly widespread use of each. But as to privacy we are
very strict. Some of the world's experts on privacy live here too.
New Hampshire has its elected officials, like any other state. So, I
can't image the elected ones are behind the increased privacy. Unless NH
politicians are so far "ahead of the curve" compared to politicians in
other states?
Or, there could be a "secret society" that largely runs NH & wants
better privacy?
Surely, NH doesn't have any more powerful visitors than say,
Connecticut, Hawaii, Washington DC or several others?
"Don't require seat belts?" Kinda behind times, isn't it? Does NH
allow "new fangled motorized automobiles" on the streets? :D Aren't seat
belts a federal requirement, or if not, doesn't a state choosing not to
require them, lose a whole lot of federal funding? "New Hampshire - The
Live Fast & Die Hard State."... hee-hee
--
tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
