One more attempt... 
iptables -t nat -a PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p udp --dport 53 -j REDIRECT 
--to-ports 53iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p tcp --syn -j REDIRECT 
--to-ports 9040
And the rules that I'm considering... 

iptables -P INPUT DROPiptables -P FORWARD DROPiptables -P OUTPUT DROP

iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A INPUT -m state --state 
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPTiptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A 
OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Apologies for the spam! 
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:59:23 +0000
> Subject: [tor-talk] Isolating Proxy and iptables.
> 
> I'm setting up a Tor-based isolating proxy using the 'Anonymizing Middlebox' 
> iptables rules specified here: 
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TransparentProxy
> i.e.
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p udp --dport 53 -j REDIRECT 
> --to-ports 53iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p tcp --syn -j 
> REDIRECT --to-ports 9040
> ...and the INPUT, OUTPUT and FORWARD chains are left at the default. Would 
> there be any merit to also including the following rules?
> iptables -P INPUT DROPiptables -P FORWARD DROPiptables -P OUTPUT DROP
> iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A INPUT -m state --state 
> ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state 
> ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> Or are they rendered unnecessary by my current setup?
> Are there any other firewall rules that I should consider in order to improve 
> security and ensure that all traffic is torified?
> Many thanks.                                    
> -- 
> tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
                                          
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Reply via email to