On 5/15/14, I <[email protected]> wrote: > If the poor image was caused by dramatic and sensational language appealing > to imagination then cool factual language would avoid that. > ? private sites ? > ? private net ?
I think the obvious terms were being used - Freenet was an application for example. "private" is the same vein as "dark" - there is a raunchy images magazine called Private I think - but I may have the name wrong. internet3 ? LibreInternet ? -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
