On 12/26/13, nano <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/12/2013 8:51 PM, Lee wrote: >> On 12/25/13, nano <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 26/12/2013 7:46 AM, Mirimir wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2013 02:59 AM, nano wrote: >>>>> On 25/12/2013 8:11 PM, Lunar wrote: >>>>>> nanotek: >>>>>>> I really didn't get the "rape" vibe from the graphic at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you describe what is in the graphic? >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you try to summarize its intended meaning? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sure. I shared my favoured interpretation earlier. >>>>> >>>>> Beyond that, I see Jefferson fucking Obama from behind (i.e. bucking >>>>> of >>>>> ignominious attempts to erode our hard-earned constitutional >>>>> convention). It is very well done too. Picture perfect! >>>> >>>> Isn't it the NSA that's been doing most of the backdoor fucking? >>> >>> Indeed. The irony only adds to its appeal. >>> >>>> >>>> Tor is rather more like a chastity belt than a crown ;) >>>> >>> >>> Tor empowers citizens to royally fuck Orwellian tactical planning, such >>> as that which is implemented by the NSA. >> >> You should take another look at the docs - eg: >> https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torvm/trunk/doc/design.html >> >> Indefensible Attacks >> Tor Attacks >> Attacks which Tor cannot defend against, like a global passive >> adversary or traffic confirmation attacks, are obviously outside the >> scope of even the most robust Tor implementation. >> >> Regards, >> Lee >> > > There is no need. It has been read many times. > > Not sure how your suggestion diminishes Tor's utility in circumventing > Orwellian policies.
I'm just pointing out that the NSA is a global passive adversary. My guess is that Tor's ability to royally fuck Orwellian tactical planning by the NSA is minimal, but it's possible we have different definitions of "royally fuck" :) Lee -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
