16.06.2013 20:38, Moritz Bartl: Hi Moritz,
> > It was decided that we have no resources to maintain our own Q&A, and > that having a third-party Q&A is better than none. I disagree, but > that's not the point. I'm not sure what you disagree with. That there are not enough resources? That it is better to have some Q&A than none? I share adrelanos's opinion that it is better to have some Q&A then none. Assuming it is actually helpful to people, of course. I'm not in the position to argue about the resources necessary or available, because I have no clue of both. Call me naive, but the same people will answer the questions regardless of the service that is used. In theory the Q&A should be self-governing and only software updates should be required. > I agree that the community should have been > involved in this process more. In the end, from what I see, most Tor > developers have other things in their heads and don't want to also worry > about how we do user support. > I agree that the Tor devs shouldn't have to worry. They should care about producing working code and designs for the future. I don't know how much the community could contribute. Let's hope the comment [1] turns out to be wrong. "I doubt the Tor Q&A page will take off,(...)." [1] https://blog.torproject.org/comment/reply/701/24500 _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
