scarp: > SiNA Rabbani: >> Why on earth we got people advertising a sourceforge link for the >> Tor Browser???? On tor-talk....? > >> This only creates confusion for the users we work so hard to >> educate :/ > >> Someone should put an end into this. --SiNA > > TBH I'm not even sure why it's still on source forge when it's clearly > in violation of TPO trademarks. Guess SF don't take that too seriously.
Guess the trademark holders never filed a complaint. > There's actually a number of other "Tor Browsers" besides the > /torbrowser one, namely /torproject, /toruser12 and /securitytor all > of them seem extremely dodgy and seem to be distributed on SF. Yes, unfortunately there is not one serious project among them. > The thing that worries me is that by calling it "Tor" or "Tor Browser" > they are attempting to trick users into believing it's the same as > torproject.org's distribution of the "Tor Browser". > > If these were genuine projects there's no reason why they can't call > it something else. Yes. > I'm just worried one of these might be an adversary to Tor trying to > distribute a compromised version of Tor to a particular community in > order to compromise it's user's identity. I don't think this requires violating a trademark. _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
