-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2012 01:16 PM, and...@torproject.is wrote:
> : Has that alternative approach ('tar xzf' without prior 'rm -rf')
> : negative side effects? I don't know. Maybe Mike or someone can
> answer better.
I'd be interested in hearing about any gotchas as well. I just
upgraded that way this morning (for the fifth or sixth time) and it
seems to be working well for me, i.e., nothing I set up or bookmarked
previously has broken. However, "works for me" is hardly more than a
single useful data point.
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS (MED)]
Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/
PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/
"For my next trick: anvils." --Harry Dresden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlC1ArIACgkQO9j/K4B7F8EAQgCdFg/RwHZ3HfqB8XOPf/+zfsqF
/goAniAFQxXnpA1k2dKH/YlIJQK4/fXE
=osPh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
