grarpamp: >> I'd like to see more discussion from more people here first, and see >> whether somebody steps up to say, "Yeah, I can maintain that" here, or >> whether somebody else who knows more than me about the issues has something >> to say. Otherwise I don't know whether to write a "looking for maintainer" >> post, a "who wants to fork" post, a "don't use Torsocks, use XYZZY" post, >> or what. > > I've been using torsocks for years. Some comments: > [...] > - It is not necessary given TransPort and DNSPort. > [...]
I don't agree. torsocks is still useful to prevent identity correlation through circuit sharing. Pushing all traffic through Trans- and DnsPort is not the answer. _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
