On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 20:11, A. Megas wrote: > My turn. Cool! We're having a contest! > You're insinuating that some dark conspiracy is at work with Dooble. > Dooble
This is a Straw Man Fallacy. Check it out on the web, although you might be using it on purpose. I was not insinuating. I was stating. I never said conspiracy. I wrote scam. I have nothing with yet another lame browser attempt. I'd like to see a lightweight (like Webkit, or better) privacy oriented engine. Repacks of the same three engines over and over again only make a mess because each repack (you call it a browser I assume) comes with another version. Which makes the excuse used by Randolph (if I recall well) „it's not our problem, it's Webkit's” weaseling. Version 1.01 of the „browser” has a Webkit version. Version 1.02 might have another. And another „browser” packs yet a third patch. From this standpoint Firefox is the cleanest. > isn't a scam. It's a Web browser with real users, real feedback, and real > goals. It's one thing when you harass other projects that intend to use What's that with real users? Opera Mini is a mobile browser with mobile users as opposed to your „real” users? Again, the Straw Man Fallacy. You can have as many browsers around as many engines you like. Most people do not care about their privacy. And are ready to use HTTP over their mobile phone. On the other hand, Tor has another issue. Check out the real Tor pages. Those people can be harmed for a leak in privacy. > or > misuse it (or misrepresent it) and another when you're attacking > something > you don't understand. Dooble doesn't profit from any advertisements or Cliché: attacking something you don't understand. So there is one pack audited for security and with quite some following which is QUITE safe. And another labeled just like the first yet a basement project of a couple of men I don't know. In all this silly debate I have never seen some names. Who handles security? Is it prof. X at the University of LaLaLand? Is it long time security speaker Y? Or the hacker who patched the weird 898989 bug into Firefox? No. I've read about yet another scam of using the name of a well known developer who, isn't it amazing? has nothing to do with your project. > special interests. I don't have some suits directing me and I don't live Does not profit from this or that is dust thrown in the eyes of the audience. Does not profit because it's a marginal project. I would like to see that after it passes 15% usage rates. And with some documents, statements. Not just rhetorics. > in > some hive either. Your belligerent attitude is mundane and pointless. You Yet you answer without touching the points. > ought to properly address your complaints and anger to the > torbrowser.sf.netproject. As I've written on another Tor mailing list, It's not anger. But, come to think about it should be. As I have a feeling none of you involved with this project will take responsability for the victims in case there would be proof. > Dooble doesn't > require Tor's blessing. Dooble is free software that is continuously > improving. Have some manners. I don't care if it's unfit for Tor. I Than why are you here? > didn't > design and implement Dooble for Tor. Again, contact the respective > project > and offer constructive criticisms. I was amazed by this one. I have checked what I've sent. It was not for the Dooble development team. It was not for the Dooble mailing list. It was not sent to you. Maybe I have some weird kind of virus that adds names to my To: field. Can you help me with that? Whom else, besides the tor list has received my email? Also, would you care documenting yourself about the use of email? The answer doesn't come on top. Unless you care about people reading you and optionally reading the other. Also, the message should be trimmed from the waste. Leaving the tor list signature might mean you were so preocupied with crafting your message you haven't noticed that. As it might also mean you don't care so much about the appearance of your emails. Which probably means you are one of the best people to point out the lack of manners. Cheers _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
