At 10:26 AM 8/10/2012 -0400, you wrote:
>-------- Original Message --------
>>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:00:39 +0300
>> From: Maxim Kammerer <[email protected]>
>>
>> Yes, if gathering .onion access statistics were possible, I would load
>> each .onion address in a top-50 list and see what it contains, or
>> search for the address if access requires authentication. The reason
>> is that I am curious and don't have an agenda to protect, unlike Tor
>> project policy people. Why do you pretend that it's difficult to do?
>
>It's not pretending that it's difficult to do. It is, in fact, difficult to
>do just by the nature of how Tor functions. Even if you were logging
>everything that came out of an exit node that you control, you wouldn't be
>able to get good stats from that. You'd need a significant sampling of other
>Tor exit nodes to do the same thing. It's a bit hard to accept that you don't
>have an agenda to protect when you come in here asserting one of the most
>demonizing talking points against Tor with nothing hard to back up your claims
>other than "some guy on reddit said so."
This is probably a dumb question, so I apologize in advance.
Controlling exit nodes doesn't allow people to know what's going on
inside the .onion darknet? Or does it?
>_______________________________________________
>tor-talk mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
