On 2012-02-29, MacLemon <t...@maclemon.at> wrote: > On 29.02.2012, at 18:34, Roger Dingledine wrote: >>> Would it hurt to implement obfsproxy into a relay? >> Somebody needs to sit down and solve >> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1776 >> first > > May I draw the following conclusion from that or have I fallen for a > misunderstanding? > > Implementing obfsproxy as instructed here > https://www.torproject.org/projects/obfsproxy-instructions.html.en > but not setting "BridgeRelay 1" does actually make sense to potentially help > people reach tor? (Given the way Iran currently handles tor traffic.) > > This is what I meant with “implementation”. I guess it was bad wording on my > part (since I’m not native english speaking). I did net actually mean to > incorporate obfsproxy functionality into the tor binary (at the moment).
It was bad wording, but we both knew what you had to have meant. Robert Ransom _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk