On 06.10.2011 14:28, Joe Btfsplk wrote: >> Vote here if you are okay with it: >> https://verein.ing-diba.de/sonstiges/01099/zwiebelfreunde-ev > This is a very worth cause - I would have no problem voting. But in the > tradition of Tor security & in light of all recent discussions about > faked SSL certificates, shouldn't you have included your public key, > esp. when asking reader to follow a link from email - concerning such a > topic?
You are right, I should have signed the mail. > It was marked spam by my provider (I removed from subject). I'm fairly > sure it is really you, Moritz, (though no way to tell) but it is an > unsolicited / unexpected link through email. I put in [SPAM] in the header because I don't feel too comfortable advertising "vote for me" links. That being said, thank you all for voting. Don't forget that you have to open the confirm link that is sent via email AND then push another button on the website to make it a valid vote. -- Moritz Bartl https://www.torservers.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
