--- On Wed, 8/31/11, Fabian Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin Fick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Matthew <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/08/why-ip-addresses-alone-dont-identify-criminals > > > > > > > > > If you run an exit relay, consider operating it in a > > > Tor-friendly commercial facility instead of your home > > > to make it less likely that law enforcement agents will > > > show up at your door. > > > > Hmm, I am surprised by the EFFs advice here. > > > > It it is legal as they claim, shouldn't they be > > heralding us to run an exit node at home and not > > be intimidated by ignorant law enforcement? And > > that they will help defend us in case of an > > issue? > > > > After all, they are recommending open wireless > > access points from individuals: > > > > http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/04/open-wireless-movement > > I think getting raided due to running a Tor exit node at > home (or even remotely) is a lot more likely than getting > raided due to running an open wireless access point.
Tell that to this guy: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/24/unsecured-wifi-child-pornography-innocent_n_852996.html That raid sounds worse than any tor related raid I have read about in any country, -Martin _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
