> The bug is that its probably overloading their site, and/or pushing > traffic onto very expensive specialized hosting. > >> Removing/Disabling the whole site (when it is working) goes against >> all the principles that EFF stands for. Unless it doesn't work it >> should not be removed. > > I think this position is silly. If HTTPS everywhere says no to > reddit's request, the site will just make it not work.
How does HTTPSE stack up against the various illegal access/use of computer/resource laws. After all, the sites may not intend for that to be the general access method. Of course HTTPSE is just an agnostic tool and the user would be to blame. But it does strike rather silly that a site would complain when they enable HTTPS over whatever portions of their site they chose... and a user uses it as such. Oh wait, that's the 'he said she said' illegal access thing again :) _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
