--- On Fri, 8/5/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>> http://www.technologyreview.com/communications/38207/?p1=A1 > > >>>It's worth reading the paper: I think that simply getting high profile sites to run to r nodes would be more likely and less invasive to the internet as a whole. If google were to simply run a bunch of bridges, or even known tor entry nodes, that would likely be more reliable and be less pie in the sky. If you compare the advocacy it would take to get enough ISPs to implement this scheme versus the advocacy to get a few high profile (can't live without them) sites to run tor nodes, I suspect the latter would be much easier. -Martin _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
