Thank you. I also have been experiencing this problem. :-)
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 14:54, Georg Koppen <g...@torproject.org> wrote: > > Georg Koppen: >> mikefloyd2: >>> Following further decline of my server's consensus weight, I looked around >>> a bit. >>> I found some more servers that show similar behavior in the graphs shown on >>> the Metrics website: >>> * >>> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/01729F10A81DDD8A92D770B2133082EB56C75E26 >>> * >>> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/010B7728454411F485CE29D4C79A14534151C2C4 >>> * >>> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/1E5136DDC52FAE1219208F0A6BADB0BA62587EE6 >>> * >>> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/899D1D12BBF6ED445048CB302C0F14B6D15ADCA2 >>> * >>> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/00DCAEAE3E54C32809E7F7CC4BF2A6FC68FC552F >> >> Alright, that's useful, thanks! I've added those links to our ticket[1] >> in case we need further data in order to track the problem down and fix it. >> >> As a general note: I asked the operator of bastet to switch back to >> Torflow as soon as possible, so that Torflow-backed bandwidth >> authorities have a majority again in our network. That should mitigate >> the immediate problem and get all your relays back to appropriate >> consensus weights (unless there are sbws-unrelated bugs preventing >> that). Additionally, it gives us time to track down this bug and >> properly fix it. > > We think we found the problem and fixed it. Again, thanks to everyone > who reported this problem. After some testing we decided it would be > save if bastet's bandwidth authority switched over to sbws again. This > happened with the 1600 UTC vote. Please keep your eyes open in case > there are more critical bugs lurking and if you find any issue do not > hesitate to report it. > > Thanks, > Georg > >> Sorry for the inconvenience, >> Georg >> >> [1] >> https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/sbws/-/issues/40091#note_2738902 >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. >>> >>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 9th, 2021 at 5:41 PM, Scott Bennett <benn...@sdf.org> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Claus Jacobsen tor99conn...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mike is not the only one - I've been seeing the exact same thing. >>>>> >>>>> My relay is >>>>> >>>>> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A2F5DF163132CF8FFC1F6343135D3397CA85CF89 >>>> >>>> I posted an alarm about this on 3 June, but there were no followups. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2021-June/019679.html >>>> >>>> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG >>>> >>>> - Internet: bennett at sdf.org xor bennett at freeshell.org * >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> - "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * >>>> - objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * >>>> - -- a standing army." * >>>> - -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * >>>> >>>> tor-relays mailing list >>>> >>>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >>>> >>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tor-relays mailing list >>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >> > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
