I have nothing against this proposal although im not sure it would be that much efficient. Especially, how does it make relay operations 'less sustainable' or 'more risky'?
@Imre Jonk: why would you want - and why should you have - an higher probability? Sounds to me the ideal case is an infinite amount of independent exits with an almost-zero probability. C On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 12:28 AM Felix <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi nusenu > > Thank's you for your encouraging efforts to keep things safe. > > Am 05.07.2020 um 18:35 schrieb nusenu: > > To prevent this from happening over and over again > > I'm proposing two simple but to some extend effective relay requirements > > to make malicious relay operations more expensive, time consuming, > > less sustainable and more risky for such actors > > Is an issue real or not? Any answer to that question does not contradict > a substantial method. Right, the proposed measure is not against > sneek-in attackers but it buys time to detect and tackle sudden issues. > Let's move forward. I hear you. > > -- > Cheers, Felix > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
