Interesting. Is there any reason to not use an obfuscated bridge? On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 2:16 PM David Fifield <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 07:41:26PM -0400, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: > > Is China successfully probing OBFS4 bridges? Or does this apply more to > non > > obfs bridges? > > China doesn't dynamically probe obfs4 bridges. (More precisely: they may > try to probe, but the probes don't result in blocks for obfs4.) They > only block obfs4 bridges whose addresses they learn in other ways. The > MSS=1400 trick works, the authors report, even for non-obfuscated > bridges. > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
