So just letting Quad9 wouldn’t solve things if Verizon needs to block a specific IP Address. It’s good to hear blocking that one server doesn’t cripple the Tor network. I hope this gets resolved.
Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2018, at 11:45 AM, Matthew Finkel <matthew.fin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:36:58AM -0400, Nathaniel Suchy (Lunorian) wrote: >> If Verizon is suddenly worried about malware, why not block at the DNS level >> with something like Quad9 where it’s managed by more competent >> professionals? (Of course still allowing alternate DNS Servers) > > They probably do this, too. > >> Does Tor bootstrap by IP Address directly? > > Yes > >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On May 16, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Alex Xu <alex_y...@yahoo.ca> wrote: >>> >>> Quoting Roger Dingledine (2018-05-16 15:05:29) >>>> The fix (if my theory is right) would be to reach whatever engineer made >>>> this leap, and teach them about Tor. But it will be extra challenging >>>> because they don't even know that there's something they need to learn. >>> >>> like the fact that malware can have more than one C&C server? :/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tor-relays mailing list >>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
