As long as their alternate resolvers do not censor any queries it's (probably) allowed and will (probably) not get you flagged as a bad exit for censoring traffic.
On 5/11/18 12:24 PM, nusenu wrote: > > > Toralf Förster: >> On 05/11/2018 01:41 PM, Nathaniel Suchy (Lunorian) wrote: >>> Like OpenDNS, Quad9 is a censoring DNS resolver >> Is this true for 9.9.9.10 too ? > > > https://quad9.net/faq/ >> Is there a service that Quad9 offers that does not have the blocklist >> or other security? >> >> The primary IP address for Quad9 is 9.9.9.9, which includes the >> blocklist, DNSSEC validation, and other security features. However, >> there are alternate IP addresses that the service operates which do >> not have these security features. These might be useful for testing >> validation, or to determine if there are false positives in the Quad9 >> system. >> >> Secure IP: 9.9.9.9 Provides: Security blocklist, DNSSEC, No EDNS >> Client-Subnet sent. If your DNS software requires a Secondary IP >> address, please use the secure secondary address of 149.112.112.112 >> >> Unsecured IP: 9.9.9.10 Provides: No security blocklist, DNSSEC, sends >> EDNS Client-Subnet. If your DNS software requires a Secondary IP >> address, please use the unsecured secondary address of >> 149.112.112.10 >> >> Note: Use only one of these sets of addresses secure or unsecured. >> Mixing secure and unsecured IP addresses in your configuration may >> lead to your system being exposed without the security enhancements, >> or your private data may not be fully protected > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
