Thank you very much, interesting. So I could block URLs but not on deep packet inspection?
Markus 2016-10-04 22:04 GMT+02:00 Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu>: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Markus Koch wrote: >> Everyone is running a reduced exit policy ... I only allow HTTP + >> HTTPS and I know nobody who allows port 25 .... at the end of the day >> we all shape our exit traffic. > > Choosing what to do with your traffic based on headers is fundamentally > different, legally, than choosing what to do with it based on payload. > > In the US, it's the difference between the "pen register" category and > the "wiretap" category. I imagine there are similar terms in many other > countries. > > In the telephone metaphor (which is what many of these laws are > fundamentally based on), it's the difference between "I won't let you > call Germany" and "when you call Germany, I'll cut the connection if > you start talking about surveillance". > > You'll notice that all of the Tor mechanisms for limiting abuse work > on the header level, not the payload level. > > --Roger > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
