Well, according to this question I asked on Tor's StackExchange, version 0.2.4.26 is still technically in the recommended consensus.
At any rate, running an older version is better for diversity, isn't it? On Sep 21, 2016 2:13 AM, "shraptor" <shrap...@bahnhof.se> wrote: > On 2016-09-20 20:58, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:20:03PM +0200, shraptor wrote: >> >>> What's up with these messages I get in tor-arm and log? >>> >>> Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor [62 duplicates hidden] >>> >>> What is tor doing?? >>> >>> Sep 20 19:10:21.000 [notice] Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor >>> >> >> It looks like this notice-level entry was changed to an info-level entry >> starting in Tor 0.2.7.1-alpha: >> > > ... > > >> So it looks like you are running an old version of Tor? You should >> upgrade and the line should go away. In any case it should be harmless. >> > > > Yeah well I'm running on rpi3 and it says in tor-arm that 0.2.5 is the > recommended > version for this architecture. > > Anyway I checked out your public repo's of armhf compiled tor packages. > These packages are unfortunately dependent on libsystemd that is not > welcome on my systems. > I am running devuan as OS. > > So I have looked into building a newer version myself but it is a bit of > jungle > to setup the tool chain for me. > > > I hadn't noticed this log-message before and had some trouble with my > relay so felt the need to seek information. > > /scooby > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
