I believe also being highly known and trusted by the Tor project leads, likely the current dirauths, and the community as a whole.
On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Sanjeev Gupta <gha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > What are the requirements, apart from long-term stability, for this? > > On 21 Jul 2016 12:18 pm, "Sebastian Hahn" <sebast...@torproject.org> wrote: >> >> > On 21 Jul 2016, at 05:20, Me <i...@gumbyzee.torzone.net> wrote: >> > So what are we going to do when Green shuts down the Bridge Authority >> > server next month? Will it have a serious effect, or will there be any >> > apparent issues or slowdowns? >> >> We'll have to act before that. We're currently looking for >> a new operator for the bridge authority and a suitable hosting >> location, which we will want to include in Tor releases asap. >> For a while we will feed the data from the two concurrently >> running bridge authorities to the bridge database for >> distribution to users, then when Tonga (Lucky's auth) is shut >> down the new one will have taken over. We will lose the data >> about all bridges that aren't updated after the time Tonga is >> shut off. This means fewer bridges for bridge db to give out and >> potentially a drop in counted (not necessarily actual) bridge >> users of Tor. >> >> Cheers >> Sebastian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays